Časopis BIOM, články a sborníky | Domovská stránka
Possibilities of aerobic and anaerobic biological treatment of organic waste (1998)
The decision on what type of treatment will be used depends on:
Ad 1: The most important properties of waste for biological treatment are:
Table 1: Comparison of parameters of three methods of biological treatment (the table is drawn up with data from these publications: Váňa 19941, Zajonc 19922, Gorodnij 19903, Hartenstein 19894, ČSN 66 57355, Meynell 19766, Karki and Dixit 19847). | ||||
Composting | Vermicomposting | An. digestion | ||
Before | Optimal C/N | 30-35/11 | 20/11 | 20-30/16 |
the | pH | 6-81 | min. 5; opt. 6.5-7.5; max.92 | 6-77 |
process | Min. content of P (% of P2O5) | 0.21 | ||
Electrolytic conductivity (mS/cm) | max. 34 | |||
In | Time of treatment (month) | min. 2-31 | summer: 2-3; winter: 3-53 | |
the | Optimal humidity (%) | when 70% of porosity is watered1 | min. 60; opt. 70-80; max. 902 | |
course | Optimal temperature (°C) | opt. 50-60; max. 681 | min. 5;opt. 18-25;max. 352 | 35 or 55 |
of | Oxygen demand (% O2 in environment) | 152 | No O2 | |
biological | Maximum concentration of CO2 (%) | 62 | No limit | |
treatment | Maximum height of compost pile (m) | 41 | 0.6 (0.8)2 | |
Maximum content of ammonia (%) | 0.12 | |||
Parameters | Maximum C:N | 30/15 | ||
for the | pH | 6.0-8.55 | ||
org. fertilizer | Humidity (%) | min. 40; max. 655 |
According to properties of biowaste can be decided which technology is the best. Then can be optimised parameters of the process. Unfit properties of the material can be balanced by addition of material which has opposite properties. In this way can be optimised C/N, content of nutrients, presence of aerobic / anaerobic microbes and physical properties. If You want compost some material with low porosity, You can add e.g. straw, but not more than 5% because it significantly increase volume of the mixture.
When are some hygienic problems presupposed, then should be used technologies with higher temperatures; that is bioreactors for composting (usually ~70°C, 1 week) and thermophilic (55°C) process for AD. If there is no hygienic risk, as during AD of plants, we can use mesophilic (35°C) process, which is more stable, produce approximately the same amount of methane and doesn't consume so much heat.
In some European countries are these requirements for sanitation of material during composting (ORCA 19921,ČSN 46 57352):
Country | Temperature [°C] |
Exposure [days] |
Austria1 | 65 |
6 (or 2*3) |
Belgium1 | 60 |
4 |
Denmark1 | 55 |
14 |
France1 | 60 |
4 |
Italy1 | 55 |
3 |
Netherlands1 | 55 |
2 |
Czech Rep. (composts suspected of pathogenic organisms) 2 | 55 |
21 |
CR (other composts) 2 | 45 |
5 |
Generally is the process of composting influenced by temperature in this way:
>55°C | maximal sanitation |
45-55°C | maximal biodegradation rate |
35-40°C | maximising of microbial diversity |
Ad 2: There are these kinds of assortment of municipal waste:
Ad. 3: The amount of waste is important in particular for AD. The minimum amount of substrate needed for AD depends on its type. Generally we can say that in developed countries with high hygienic and safety requirements is the minimum amount of biowaste 5000 t/year (it is biowaste from a city with 50 000 - 70 000 dwellers). Composting can be operated in all scales.
Ad. 4: Investment and operation is cheaper for larger plants, but the transport is cheaper for smaller plants (on a unit of material - ton or m3). In the cost of plant should be calculated possible environmental impacts (cost of remediation). In countries with low wages is better to use more manual force than mechanical. Sometimes is possible to use prisoners who can be motivated also by reduction of their prison term.
Our current research and projects
In our laboratory we now try to find the best way of AD of grass. Our current conviction is that grass should be digested by a two stage mesophilic process with liquid recirculation. Recirculation of liquid phase serves as inoculation and saves heat. Process can be intensified by addition of some elements, e.g. Co (Jarvis et al. 1997).
We also design composters for specific purposes and test composting technologies.
Literature
ČSN 46 5735: (1991): Průmyslové komposty. Vydavatelství norem, Praha.
GORODNIJ, N.M.; MELNIK, I.A.; POUCHAN, M.F.: (1990): Biokonversija organičeskych otchodov v biodinamičeskom chozjajstve. Urožaj, Kijev, 254 p.
HARTENSTEIN, R.; BISESI, M. S.: (1989): Use of earthworm biotechnology for the management of effluents from intensively housed livestock. Outlook on agriculture, 18 (2), pp. 72-76.
JARVIS, A.; NORDBERG, A.; JARLSVIK T.; MATHISEN, B. and SVENSSON, B.H. : (1997): Improvement of a grass-clover silage-fed biogas process by the addition of cobalt. Biomass & Bioenergy 12, p. 6.
KARKI, A.B. and DIXIT,K. (1984): Biogas Fieldbook. Sahayogi Press, Tripureshwar, Kathmandu, Nepal, 87 p.
MEYNELL, P.J. (cit. Stafford et al. 1981, p. 162): (1976): Methane: Planning a Digester, Prism, Detroit, 1976.
ORCA: (1992): A review of compost standards in Europe. ORCA technical publication No 2, published by ORCA, Brussels, December 1992.
STAFFORD, D.A.; HAWKES, D.L. and HORTON, R.: (1981): Methane production from waste organic matter. CRC Press, Florida, 285 p. - (p.113-114).
VÁŇA,J.: (1994): Výroba a využití kompostů v zemědělství. Institut výchovy a vzdělávání MZe ČR v Praze, Agrodat, 40 p.
ZAJONC, I.: (1992): Chov žížal a výroba vermikompostu. Animapress, Povoda, okres Dunajská Streda, 59 p.